UN Millennium Human Development Goals

I was reading through the UN Millenium Human Development Goals the other day for research at work.

Human Development Report 2003, Millennium Development Goals: A compact among nations to end human poverty.


As I reflect back upon this report, among the goals that I recall from the report:

-Reducing child mortality
-Increasing access to basic health care
-Increasing access to education
-Spreading democracy and democratic practices
-Reducing violent conflicts around the globe
-Reducing violence against women and empowering women

Aren't these American values? Aren't these moral values? Wouldn't you like to see an American foreign policy that supported these goals as a primary objective?

Wouldn't such a foreign policy lay the groundwork for putting an end to terrorism?

I have a hard time understanding those who oppose the UN as an institution and its mission.

By the way, the world is currently falling short on reaching these goals.

Comments

Bill Baar said…
Read David Brooks from two years ago,

Less dramatic declines in extreme poverty have been noted around the developing world, with the vital exception of sub-Saharan Africa. It now seems quite possible that we will meet the United Nations' Millennium Development Goals, which were set a few years ago: the number of people living in extreme poverty will be cut in half by the year 2015. As Martin Wolf of The Financial Times wrote in his recent book, "Why Globalization Works": "Never before have so many people - or so large a proportion of the world's population - enjoyed such large rises in their standard of living."

I haven't read the latest report but I'd say the geatest threat to the world's poor right now is resurgent protectionism from our Newly elected Congress.

I heard historian Timothy Garton Ash on Chicago's WBEZ in February 21, 2005 say the best thing the US and UK could do to reduce world poverty was drop trade barriers and drop our agricultural subsidies.

Even slimmer chance of that now with this Congress.
December 03, 2006
Louis Merlin said…
I have no problem believing that free trade could cause dramatic declines in poverty rates. I'm quite practical about how we achieve this goal - my only concern is that we make it a priority as a nation and participate in the work to make it happen.
December 03, 2006
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Idea of "White Supremacy Culture" is Offensive

Anyone with a cursory knowledge of history and cultures knows that all cultures have both oppressive and liberatory aspects. Historically, it was quite typical to conquer, kill, and enslave neighboring groups or nations - just ask the Aztecs or the Mongols. Historically, European and American culture are rife with oppressive aspects, but not particularly more so than any other culture. Part of the joy of being an Unitarian Universalist for me has been its openly syncretic approach to finding wisdom; that is, we seek great wisdom from all cultures, and at least historically have been able to borrow and build upon such wisdom without apology. In my own personal experience, I have gained wisdom from European, Asian, African, and Native American cultures, among others; as well as Christian, Islamic, Jewish, Buddhist, and Pagan beliefs. To pursue truth and wisdom wherever you find it has historically been one of our great blessings. With new walls being erected about certain traditional bel
Read more

Universalism and Color Translucency

 I believe in universalism. That is, I believe what connects us as human beings is more important than what divides us. The inherent worth and dignity of all persons. That all persons are entitled to dignity and respect. It's not a new belief. It's not an easy belief. Conceptually it's quite simple. And yet I don't think it needs revision. I don't think it needs an asterisk. I think universalism is a concept that can endure across time and across space. The love that I feel is not different than the love you feel. Nor is the pain or the suffering or the yearning. Nor is my flawed nature. My mortal nature. My limited nature. We are different in so many particulars, and yet we share so much in common as human beings. Put it another way. I think our common humanity is more important than our hyphenated humanity. We are different races, genders, sexualities, ages, and capabilities but none of this should divide us irreconcilably. It is possible to connect across these d
Read more

Two Types of Community Conversations

When I think about what it means to be a Unitarian Universalist and how that might change, I think about two different ways of having conversations. If the first way, we start from the principle of universal human equality and human dignity. We start from the approach that the search for truth is grounded in love. This is based upon our current Seven Principles. Based upon these principles, all voices will be given equal weight and an equal chance to be heard. And those listening will endeavor to listen charitably, with an ear to acknowledging and empathizing with what each speaker says. Under such conditions the growth of mutual understanding is possible. While agreement will not always be reached, we can build community through this process of recognizing each other, including recognizing our very real differences. In the second way, we start from the assumption that all verbal interactions should be seen through the lens of unequal power. People of color, women, and LGBTQ people hav
Read more